Conservative US Commentators Claim They Were Unwitting Participants in Alleged Russian Scheme.

In a dramatic twist to the ongoing saga of election interference and misinformation, several prominent right-wing influencers in the United States have claimed they were duped into participating in a Russian disinformation scheme. The allegations come from a recent indictment accusing Moscow of secretly manipulating US media to advance its political aims.

The indictment, released earlier this week, accuses Russian state broadcaster RT (formerly Russia Today) of orchestrating a complex conspiracy to infiltrate US media by funding Tennessee-based firm Tenet Media with $10 million (£7.6 million). The firm was reportedly tasked with creating and broadcasting content to US audiences that subtly promoted Russian government messages.

The indictment suggests that Tenet Media, a company founded in 2022 by conservative Canadian YouTuber Lauren Chen and her husband Liam Donovan, may have unwittingly served as a vehicle for Russian interests. Despite not being directly named in the indictment, Tenet Media has been identified by US media outlets as the firm involved. The company has yet to publicly address the allegations or respond to requests for comment.

Allegations and claim of victimhood

Several right-wing influencers who worked with Tenet Media have publicly expressed their concerns about being manipulated by the alleged Russian conspiracy. These include Tim Pool, David Rubin and Benny Johnson, who have taken to social media to defend themselves against allegations of collusion. They argue that, if the allegations are true, they were mere victims of a sophisticated scheme hatched by Russian operatives.

Tim Pool, best known for his podcast “The Culture War,” expressed his frustration on X/Twitter, telling his 2.1 million followers that he and other commentators had been “duped” and should be considered victims if the allegations prove true. Poole emphasized his belief that he maintained full editorial control over his content and was unaware of any underlying Russian influence.

Similarly, Benny Johnson, who has 2.7 million followers on X, expressed his discomfort at the indictment’s revelations. He claimed that his company’s lawyers had struck a standard deal with Tenet Media, which was later terminated. Johnson denied any knowledge of the alleged Russian involvement, calling himself a victim of a conspiracy. David Rubin, who has 1.5 million followers on X, also distanced himself from the allegations. He said that his show on Tenet Media had ended months earlier and that he had not been contacted by the Justice Department. Rubin reiterated the sentiment that he and other commentators were victims of the scheme, insisting that he had no knowledge of any fraudulent activities. Details of the alleged scheme According to the indictment, Tenet Media was used to broadcast content designed to align with Russian interests and create discord within the United States. The indictment alleges that RT employees Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva played a key role in overseeing the content creation and distribution process. They are accused of conspiring to commit money laundering and violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The indictment details how Tenet Media produced nearly 2,000 videos that have been viewed more than 16 million times on YouTube. These videos often promoted right-wing narratives on controversial issues such as immigration, gender, and the economy. The content was allegedly edited, posted, and directed by RT employees to advance the interests of the Russian government.

US authorities have described influencers associated with Tenet Media as “unwitting” participants in the alleged scheme. The indictment reveals that some commentators were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars per month for their work, with payments potentially as high as $8.7 million for the most prominent celebrities.

The scheme allegedly involved the creation of a fictitious Hungarian businessman named “Eduard Grigorian” to act as a false investor. The indictment alleges that the Russians went to great lengths to fabricate this identity, including creating a fake CV and conducting phone calls with an agent presenting himself as Grigorian.

Reactions and views from influencers

As the allegations emerged, the right-wing influencers involved have reacted with a mixture of disbelief and defensiveness. Many have taken to social media to publicly address the allegations and claim their innocence. They argue that their editorial independence and content creation was genuine and not influenced by any outside forces.

Mats Kristiansen, a lesser-known commentator who also worked with Tenet Media, defended his role on the livestream. He insisted that he was never instructed by anyone to promote specific messages and that he wrote all of his content independently.

Iran’s Growing Role in U.S. Election Disinformation: A New Threat.

Ahead of the 2024 US presidential election, growing concern has emerged over Iran’s sophisticated disinformation efforts aimed at influencing American voters and destabilizing the democratic process. Recent investigations suggest that Iran has increased its activities in cyberspace, employing a variety of tactics to influence public opinion and undermine confidence in the electoral system.

A New Phase of Iranian Disinformation
Historically, Iran’s disinformation campaigns were influenced by the more prominent activities of Russia and China. However, recent developments indicate that Iran has adopted more aggressive and diverse methods in its efforts to influence US politics. This escalation has included hacking operations, the creation of deceptive websites, and the promotion of false stories on social media platforms.

One of the most notable strategies involves the establishment of fake news websites designed to appear as legitimate news sources. For example, websites such as the Savannah Times, Neothinker, and the Westland Sun, which claim to provide news and commentary from specific political and cultural viewpoints, are actually fronts for Iranian disinformation. These sites have been used to disseminate content that is intended to influence public opinion against certain political figures and create divisions among the US electorate.

Iran’s focus on US political figures
According to US intelligence officials and cybersecurity experts, the primary target of Iran’s disinformation efforts appears to be former President Donald Trump. This focus aligns with broader Iranian objectives of influencing US electoral outcomes in a way that undermines Trump’s campaign for re-election. However, disinformation tactics are not limited to one side of the political spectrum. Iranian operatives have also targeted President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, suggesting a broader goal of creating chaos and distrust in the US political system.

Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines has expressed concern over Iran’s increasingly aggressive tactics. He warned that American voters should be cautious about engaging with unfamiliar online accounts and sources, as these may be part of Iran’s broader strategy to manipulate public perception.

Expanding Iranian influence operations
Iran’s efforts are not limited to just digital disinformation. The country has used its extensive network to engage in a variety of activities designed to influence U.S. politics. This includes hacking campaigns targeting political figures and organizations associated with the presidential race. For example, Iranian operatives have successfully breached the emails of Trump’s close adviser Roger Stone and attempted to infiltrate the campaigns of Biden and Harris.

In addition, Iran’s disinformation campaign has been linked to recent geopolitical tensions. Following Israel’s invasion of Gaza and subsequent exchanges with Hezbollah, Iran has leveraged social media to promote protests and spread anti-Israel sentiment. These actions are part of a broader strategy to exploit global conflicts and internal US issues to advance its objectives.

Evolving Iranian Strategy
Iran’s disinformation efforts have changed significantly over the years. Initially focused on traditional media, Iran has increasingly turned to cyberspace as a battleground for information warfare. This shift was further solidified in 2011 when Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called for “cyber jihad” to advance Iran’s interests and ideological goals. Since then, the country has developed a sophisticated infrastructure for digital propaganda, including the creation of front companies and the recruitment of technical talent to support its disinformation campaigns.

Recent reports from Microsoft and other cybersecurity firms show that the scale and complexity of Iranian influence operations have grown. These operations now involve the use of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, to amplify disinformation and engage US voters in more targeted ways.

Broader Impacts and Response
Iran’s disinformation campaigns have a broad impact on both US domestic politics and international relations. By fostering division and mistrust within American society, Iran aims to undermine the credibility of US democratic institutions and increase its own geopolitical influence.

The US response to these threats involves a combination of intelligence surveillance, cybersecurity measures, and public awareness campaigns. Officials have issued warnings about the potential for Iranian disinformation influencing the upcoming election and have called on voters to be cautious about the sources of their information.

Conclusion
As the 2024 US presidential election approaches, the threat of disinformation from Iran is a growing concern. The country’s increasingly aggressive strategy aims to influence not only the election outcome, but also the election of the United States.

“U.S. Set to Charge Russia with 2024 Election Meddling Efforts”

The United States is preparing to formally accuse Russia of a long-standing effort to interfere in the upcoming 2024 presidential election, according to reports from multiple US media outlets. The Biden administration is expected to respond to these allegations with a series of legal actions and possibly sanctions against those responsible.

Focus on Russian media and cyber activities

A key part of the US strategy appears to be targeting Russian state-linked media, particularly Russian state media network RT, formerly known as Russia Today. According to reports from CNN, the US government is expected to allege that RT is being used as a tool to influence American public opinion in favor of certain candidates or narratives linked to the Kremlin’s interests.

Expected legal action and sanctions

Attorney General Merrick Garland is expected to announce a series of measures on Wednesday, which could include criminal charges, sanctions and other law enforcement actions. These actions are aimed at countering what the US sees as threats to its democratic process.

History of election interference concerns

US officials have been on high alert for foreign interference, including hacking, misinformation campaigns, and other cyber tactics, since Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. More recently, in June, hackers linked to the Iranian government successfully broke into the Trump campaign and leaked sensitive internal documents that underscore the broad scope of foreign interests in disrupting US elections.

Broader implications
The allegations against Russia and anticipated actions by the Biden administration come amid growing awareness of the various methods foreign actors use to influence elections in democratic countries. The US government seeks to counter these actions not only through punitive measures but also by raising public awareness of misinformation and cyber threats ahead of the election.

The Biden administration’s response to these threats will likely involve a series of coordinated efforts involving intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and diplomatic channels. As the 2024 election approaches, the administration’s actions could set an important precedent for how the US handles election security in an age of growing global digital conflict.

Exit mobile version