Ukraine -

“No New Commitment on Ukraine Missiles: Starmer-Biden Talks Focus on Strategy Amid Russian Warnings”

In the recent high-profile meeting between UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and US President Joe Biden, the two leaders discussed in detail the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Despite the productive nature of their conversation, none of the leaders made any new commitments regarding Ukraine’s request to use long-range missiles against Russian targets.

Key points of the meeting
The discussions held at the White House focused mainly on overall strategies rather than specific actions or tactics. Sir Keir Starmer emphasized that the conversation was about shaping a comprehensive approach to the situation in Ukraine. The White House reiterated this sentiment, saying that the leaders also expressed serious concern about Iran and North Korea supplying lethal weapons to Russia.

Ukraine appeals for advanced weapons
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had recently highlighted the urgent need for advanced air defense systems and long-range missiles. According to Zelenskyy, more than 70 Iranian-made drones were launched by Russia overnight on Ukrainian territory. He emphasised that these weapons were vital to the defence of Ukrainian lives and infrastructure.

The request for long-range missiles is part of a wider appeal made by Ukraine’s leaders to their Western allies. They believe that having the ability to strike deep into Russian territory could significantly improve their defensive capabilities and put pressure on Russia for peace talks.

Reactions to Russian warnings

Prior to the Starmer-Biden talks, Russian President Vladimir Putin had issued a stern warning against the provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine. Putin argued that such a move would signal direct NATO involvement in the conflict, which he claimed would only worsen the situation.

In response to these warnings, former UK Defence Secretary Sir Ben Wallace expressed his disappointment, suggesting that the ongoing debate over these weapons was only benefiting the Russian President by withholding Western support for Ukraine. He argued that NATO should not be deterred by Putin’s threats and should consider providing Ukraine with the necessary military capabilities.

Views of US officials

Former US Special Representative for Ukraine negotiations Kurt Volker explained that Putin’s threats were designed to intimidate the West so that they would stop further support for Ukraine. Volker argued that the focus on avoiding provocations may be exaggerated and that the West should not be overly cautious about crossing so-called red lines.

US President Biden downplayed the impact of Putin’s statements while addressing the media ahead of his meeting with Starmer. Biden remarked that he did not regard Putin’s comments as a major concern, instead focusing on the strategic implications of the conflict and the broader international response.

Current status of military assistance

To date, both the US and the UK have been cautious about authorising the use of long-range missiles by Ukraine, fearing that such actions could further escalate the conflict. While Ukraine has received a variety of military aid, including long-range missiles earlier this year, their use has been restricted to avoid targets deep within Russia.

The UK has previously said Ukraine has the right to use UK-provided weapons for self-defence, but this does not extend to the use of long-range Storm Shadow missiles beyond Ukraine’s internationally recognised borders. Similarly, the US has provided long-range missiles but has not permitted their use on Russian targets away from the frontlines.

Wider implications and diplomatic context
The meeting between Starmer and Biden also discussed other global issues, including the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict and various international concerns. The two leaders plan to pursue these matters at the upcoming UN General Assembly.

The diplomatic climate surrounding the Ukraine conflict remains tense, with significant geopolitical consequences. Relations have been further complicated by Russia’s expulsion of six British diplomats, citing allegations of espionage. The UK Foreign Office has rejected these claims as baseless.

In response to US sanctions against the Russian media channel RT, which is accused of being a tool for Russian intelligence, the Russian government has criticised these measures. RT’s editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan has defended the network, while Russia’s Foreign Ministry has suggested that the US is over-emphasising the role of sanctions in its broader strategy.

Looking ahead

Ongoing negotiations between Western allies and Ukraine remain a key aspect of the international response to the conflict. As discussions progress, attention remains focused on balancing support for Ukraine and managing the risks of escalating tensions with Russia.

The international community is closely monitoring the situation as it evolves, with the hope that diplomatic efforts will help to stop the spread of the conflict.

“Biden Signals Possible Shift on Ukraine’s Use of Long-Range Missiles Against Russia”

In a significant development in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, US President Joe Biden has hinted at the possibility of lifting the ban on Ukraine’s use of US-supplied long-range missiles against Russian targets. This policy shift, if implemented, could prove to be a turning point in Ukraine’s defence strategy and potentially change the dynamics of the war that has been going on since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.

A long-standing request from Ukraine

Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukraine has consistently requested the United States and its allies to provide it with more advanced weapons, particularly long-range missiles. Ukrainian officials argue that these weapons are crucial to strike deep into Russian territory and to stop the aggressive advance of the Russian army. However, so far, Washington has been cautious about providing such capabilities due to concerns about escalating the conflict and provoking a direct confrontation with Russia.

President Biden’s recent comments suggest that this cautious approach may be changing. When asked by reporters if the U.S. would ease restrictions on Ukraine’s use of long-range weapons, Biden replied, “We’re working on it right now.” The statement has sparked significant interest and speculation among international observers and political analysts about what this could mean for the future of the conflict.

Concerns of escalation
For much of the war, the United States and its NATO allies have been wary of supplying weapons that could be used to strike deep inside Russia. The fear is that such actions could escalate the conflict into a wider war, potentially bringing NATO countries into direct confrontation with Russia or even leading to a nuclear conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously warned that attacks by Ukraine on Russian territory using missiles supplied by Western countries could lead to serious consequences. “Continuous escalation can lead to serious consequences,” he said earlier this year. “Do they want a global conflict?” The risk of escalation has been a key factor in the West’s strategic decision-making throughout the conflict. So far, while the U.S. has delivered some long-range weapons to Ukraine, these have been accompanied by strict restrictions on their use. These restrictions have generally allowed Ukraine to only strike Russian military bases near the border, from where troops are launching attacks, rather than targets deeper within Russia.

Growing pressure from Kiev
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his administration have been vocal in their frustration over the pace and scope of Western weapons deliveries. They argue that the limits imposed on the use of long-range missiles are hampering Ukraine’s ability to effectively counter Russian forces and end the invasion. Zelensky has repeatedly requested authorization to strike deep into Russian territory with missiles supplied by Western countries, a move the U.S. has so far opposed.

Kiev argues that without the ability to hit strategic targets deep in Russia, they are fighting with “one hand tied behind their back.” For Ukraine, the war is not just about defending its territory, but also about taking proactive steps to deter and degrade Russia’s military capabilities.

U.S. allies share similar concerns
The U.S. is not alone in its cautious approach. Other Western allies such as the U.K., France and Germany are also providing long-range weapons to Ukraine, but with strict conditions on their use. The shared concern among these countries is that any attack within Russian territory could spark retaliation against NATO countries or even nuclear threats from Russia.

Despite these concerns, restrictions have been gradually eased in recent months. For example, some Western-supplied weapons have been allowed to be used along the Russian border where troops are actively firing into Ukraine. This represents a slight change in policy, but it still does not allow Ukraine to target areas deep within Russia.

Iran’s role and Western sanctions
The discussions about lifting the ban on Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles come at a time when the U.S. and its allies are imposing new sanctions on Iran for allegedly supplying short-range ballistic missiles to Russia. On Tuesday, the U.S., Britain, France and Germany announced new measures against Iran, targeting individuals and entities accused of facilitating military aid for Russia.

According to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Iranian forces have trained Russian troops to use these ballistic missiles, which could be deployed against Ukrainian targets within a matter of weeks. The addition of Iran-supplied missiles to Russia’s arsenal could significantly increase its ability to strike Ukrainian cities and military bases, especially those located close to the Russian border.

“Zelensky Sacks Ukrainian Air Force Commander Amid F-16 Jet Controversy”

KYIV, Ukraine — In a dramatic development in Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has removed Lt. Gen. Mykola Oleshchuk from his position as commander of the Ukrainian Air Force. The decision comes in the wake of the recent crash of one of the country’s newly acquired F-16 fighter jets, an incident that has sparked significant debate and controversy. On Monday, President Zelenskyy made the unexpected announcement of Lt. Gen. Oleshchuk’s dismissal. The move was shrouded in mystery, as Zelenskyy refrained from revealing the specific reasons behind the decision. In his brief statement, the president emphasized the need to “take care of all our warriors” and suggested the leadership change was part of an effort to strengthen the country’s defense capabilities during a critical period. The timing of the decision is particularly notable given the recent incident involving an F-16 jet. The plane, one of several delivered by Ukraine’s

Western allies earlier this month, crashed during a barrage of Russian missiles. Tragically, the pilot of the jet was killed in the incident. The downing of the F-16 has sparked intense discussion and disagreement within Ukraine. Initial reports suggested that the crash may have been caused by enemy action, but Ukrainian officials have clarified that the incident was not directly caused by a Russian attack. The circumstances surrounding the crash have sparked heated debate among Ukrainian politicians and military officials. Lt. Gen. Oleshchuk found himself at the center of this controversy, as he clashed with various political figures over the cause of the crash. The debate intensified when Ukrainian politician Marianna Bezuhla, a member of the parliamentary defense committee, suggested that the jet may have been shot down by Ukraine’s own Patriot air defense system. This claim was vehemently denied by Oleshchuk, who insisted that investigations were ongoing and accused Bezuhla of undermining the military’s

credibility. In response to the growing pressure, President Zelenskyy’s decision to replace Lt. Gen. Oleshchuk with Lt. Gen. Anatoliy Krivonozhko was swift and decisive. Lt. Gen. Krivonozhko, who previously led Central Air Command operations, now faces the task of running the Ukrainian Air Force during a challenging period marked by rising tensions and ongoing conflict. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the country has been embroiled in a brutal and protracted conflict. Russia has seized significant portions of territory in eastern Ukraine, and in recent months, the situation has been further complicated by Ukraine’s unexpected incursions into Russian territory, including a surprise operation in Russia’s Kursk region. In response to these aggressive moves, Russia has escalated its attacks across Ukraine. The latest reports indicate that more than 400 drones and missiles have been fired at Ukraine over the past week. The intensity of these attacks has led to tragic losses, including the recent death of a 14-year-old girl in Kharkiv who was killed when a Russian guided bomb fell on a playground. Additionally, a 12-story residential building in Kharkiv was attacked, killing at least six people and injuring 59. The Role of Western Support and the F-16 Controversy The acquisition of F-16 fighter jets

from Western allies has been a significant development for Ukraine’s defense capabilities. From August 2023, around 65 F-16 aircraft have been promised by NATO countries, a move authorized by US President Joe Biden. These jets represent a significant boost to Ukraine’s aerial combat capabilities, and their deployment has been greeted with considerable anticipation. However, the crash of one of these jets has cast doubts over their deployment. The loss has sparked widespread debate about the effectiveness of Ukraine’s air defense systems and the challenges the military faces in integrating advanced Western technology into its operations. President Zelensky’s decision to dismiss Lt. Gen. Oleshchuk reflects the broader context of the rapidly evolving military situation in Ukraine. The leadership change is part of a larger effort to address challenges and setbacks in the ongoing conflict. The recent change in Ukraine’s military leadership is not an isolated event. Since the start of the full-scale invasion, President Zelensky has made several notable changes to the military command. In February 2023, Zelensky dismissed Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Valeriy Zaluzhny amid criticism over military performance and strategy. In June 2023, Lt. Gen. Yuri Sodol was also removed from his position after public criticism of high casualty rates and allegations of incompetence.