voctn -

“Taylor Swift Backs Kamala Harris, Urges Fans to Vote for ‘Calm Over Chaos'”

Pop superstar Taylor Swift has made a surprising but impactful move by publicly endorsing Kamala Harris for president in the 2024 election. The announcement came shortly after the recent presidential debate between Harris and her rival Donald Trump, which captured the attention of millions on social media.

Swift, known for her chart-topping hits and massive influence, shared her endorsement on Instagram on Tuesday night. “I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election,” she wrote. The post, which featured a photo of Swift holding her cat, quickly went viral, garnering over two million likes in just 30 minutes.

Swift’s reasons for supporting Harris
In her post, Swift explained that her decision to support Harris was not made lightly. She emphasized the thoughtful consideration behind her choice, saying, “I did my research.” She described Harris as a “steady, talented leader” and a “warrior” who stands up for rights and causes that she believes need a strong advocate. Swift highlighted Harris’ commitment to fighting for issues like women’s rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and economic justice—issues that resonate deeply with the singer and her fans.

“I think we can accomplish so much more in this country if we lead from peace, not chaos,” Swift wrote, clearly drawing a contrast between Harris’ leadership style and that of her opponent, Donald Trump. This endorsement is significant not only because of Swift’s massive social media following, but also because it connects her with a growing number of celebrities and public figures who have been vocal about their support for Harris.

Addressing misinformation and AI concerns
Swift’s post also addressed a growing concern in today’s digital age—misinformation. She revealed that she felt obliged to clarify her political stance after an AI-generated image falsely supporting Donald Trump was posted on his website. “This really sparked my fears about AI and the dangers of spreading misinformation,” Swift wrote. She added that the incident inspired her to be more transparent about her voting plans to protect her fans and followers from being misled.

This endorsement highlights a broader issue: the impact of AI and deepfake technology on politics and public opinion. With millions of followers who rely on her judgment, Swift’s decision to openly combat misinformation underscores the importance of transparency, especially in a time when technology can easily distort reality.

A jab at Trump’s running mate
Adding a bit of humor and an obvious political statement to her endorsement, Swift wrote “restless cat lady” on her post. It was a direct reference to a derogatory comment made by Trump’s vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance. In a recently resurfaced 2021 clip, Vance referred to prominent Democrats like Harris as “a bunch of restless cat ladies who are unhappy in their lives.” Swift’s playful response turned the insult into a badge of pride, resonating with her many fans who appreciate her candor and sense of humor.

Praise for Tim Walz
Swift also gave her support to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Kamala Harris’s running mate. She noted his long-standing commitment to important issues like LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive rights, and access to healthcare. “He’s stood up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and women’s right to their own bodies for decades,” she wrote. Her endorsement of Walz will appeal to young voters and those passionate about social justice issues, further strengthening the appeal of the Harris-Walz ticket.

Celebrity endorsements pile up
Swift isn’t the only one to support Kamala Harris. She joins a list of high-profile celebrities who have thrown their support behind the Democratic candidate, including John Legend, Olivia Rodrigo, George Clooney and Spike Lee. Each of these endorsements brings its own weight and influence, potentially influencing undecided voters and encouraging turnout among younger demographics.

On the other hand, Trump has also received support from a number of notable celebrities, including former wrestler Hulk Hogan, TV star Amber Rose and tech billionaire Elon Musk. These endorsements reflect the divided nature of the current political climate, with celebrities from both sides using their platform to influence the direction of the election.

Not Swift’s first political statement

This is not the first time Taylor Swift has used her platform to support a candidate against Donald Trump. In 2020, she publicly backed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in their bid for the White House, urging her fans to vote and raise their voices. Swift has been a vocal critic of Trump, particularly during nationwide protests following the killing of George Floyd. She

“Biden Signals Possible Shift on Ukraine’s Use of Long-Range Missiles Against Russia”

In a significant development in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, US President Joe Biden has hinted at the possibility of lifting the ban on Ukraine’s use of US-supplied long-range missiles against Russian targets. This policy shift, if implemented, could prove to be a turning point in Ukraine’s defence strategy and potentially change the dynamics of the war that has been going on since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.

A long-standing request from Ukraine

Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukraine has consistently requested the United States and its allies to provide it with more advanced weapons, particularly long-range missiles. Ukrainian officials argue that these weapons are crucial to strike deep into Russian territory and to stop the aggressive advance of the Russian army. However, so far, Washington has been cautious about providing such capabilities due to concerns about escalating the conflict and provoking a direct confrontation with Russia.

President Biden’s recent comments suggest that this cautious approach may be changing. When asked by reporters if the U.S. would ease restrictions on Ukraine’s use of long-range weapons, Biden replied, “We’re working on it right now.” The statement has sparked significant interest and speculation among international observers and political analysts about what this could mean for the future of the conflict.

Concerns of escalation
For much of the war, the United States and its NATO allies have been wary of supplying weapons that could be used to strike deep inside Russia. The fear is that such actions could escalate the conflict into a wider war, potentially bringing NATO countries into direct confrontation with Russia or even leading to a nuclear conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously warned that attacks by Ukraine on Russian territory using missiles supplied by Western countries could lead to serious consequences. “Continuous escalation can lead to serious consequences,” he said earlier this year. “Do they want a global conflict?” The risk of escalation has been a key factor in the West’s strategic decision-making throughout the conflict. So far, while the U.S. has delivered some long-range weapons to Ukraine, these have been accompanied by strict restrictions on their use. These restrictions have generally allowed Ukraine to only strike Russian military bases near the border, from where troops are launching attacks, rather than targets deeper within Russia.

Growing pressure from Kiev
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his administration have been vocal in their frustration over the pace and scope of Western weapons deliveries. They argue that the limits imposed on the use of long-range missiles are hampering Ukraine’s ability to effectively counter Russian forces and end the invasion. Zelensky has repeatedly requested authorization to strike deep into Russian territory with missiles supplied by Western countries, a move the U.S. has so far opposed.

Kiev argues that without the ability to hit strategic targets deep in Russia, they are fighting with “one hand tied behind their back.” For Ukraine, the war is not just about defending its territory, but also about taking proactive steps to deter and degrade Russia’s military capabilities.

U.S. allies share similar concerns
The U.S. is not alone in its cautious approach. Other Western allies such as the U.K., France and Germany are also providing long-range weapons to Ukraine, but with strict conditions on their use. The shared concern among these countries is that any attack within Russian territory could spark retaliation against NATO countries or even nuclear threats from Russia.

Despite these concerns, restrictions have been gradually eased in recent months. For example, some Western-supplied weapons have been allowed to be used along the Russian border where troops are actively firing into Ukraine. This represents a slight change in policy, but it still does not allow Ukraine to target areas deep within Russia.

Iran’s role and Western sanctions
The discussions about lifting the ban on Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles come at a time when the U.S. and its allies are imposing new sanctions on Iran for allegedly supplying short-range ballistic missiles to Russia. On Tuesday, the U.S., Britain, France and Germany announced new measures against Iran, targeting individuals and entities accused of facilitating military aid for Russia.

According to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Iranian forces have trained Russian troops to use these ballistic missiles, which could be deployed against Ukrainian targets within a matter of weeks. The addition of Iran-supplied missiles to Russia’s arsenal could significantly increase its ability to strike Ukrainian cities and military bases, especially those located close to the Russian border.

An uneasy tension settled over the packed courtroom.

An uneasy tension settled over the packed courtroom in Avignon’s Palace of Justice when the chief judge, dressed in a bright red robe, delivered the unexpected news. The trial, which has been running throughout France, was about to be adjourned. Dominique Pellicot, one of 51 men accused in a shocking gang rape case, was too ill to attend court, leading to a sense of gloom among those present.

This case is no ordinary trial – it has roiled a small French village and sparked outrage and debate across the country. It revolves around Dominique Pellicot, who is accused of drugging his wife Gisèle Pellicot for a decade and inviting more than 80 men to his home to rape her while he filmed the attacks. The trial has become a symbol of the fight against sexual violence and has cast a shadow over the quaint village of Mazan, where the crimes allegedly took place.

Village in shock

Mazan, a small medieval village nestled in the hills of Provence, is now synonymous with one of the most horrific crime stories in recent French history. Once known for its peaceful vineyards and picturesque streets, Mazan is now suffering from a deep crisis of trust. The village that once welcomed tourists and hosted events such as British actress Keira Knightley’s wedding has now become the site of a nightmare.

The people of Mazan are divided in their reactions to the trial. Some residents express exhaustion with the constant media coverage and attention the case is receiving. “Honestly, nobody cares here,” said local caterer Ivan Tuvignon, reflecting a sense of despair. Still, many others, especially women, feel a growing sense of fear and betrayal. They worry about who they can trust, especially with news that many of the alleged attackers are still unidentified.

The names of the accused are circulating widely on social media, causing an uproar in Mazan and the surrounding villages. Women like Océane Martin, who recognized several of the accused men, feel uneasy. “It creates tension, you can imagine. You don’t know who to trust on the street,” she said, sighing with relief that they would soon be moving away from the village. Her mother, Isabelle Liversen, expressed a deep fear, saying that 30 of the 80 suspects are still at large. “There is tension here because people don’t know if they can trust their neighbors,” she said, expressing the fear that looms like a dark cloud over Mazan.

A trial that unleashed a nightmare

At the center of this storm is Gisèle Pellicot, who has chosen to renounce her right to remain anonymous and become a symbol of rebellion for women across France. She has shown great courage by stepping into the spotlight to talk about her experience. Four years ago, she was told by a police officer that her husband had drugged her and videoed her being raped by strangers in her own bedroom. Since then, she has become a powerful advocate against “chemical subordination,” where victims are drugged and sexually assaulted without their knowledge.

Gisèle’s decision to speak out has impressed many. “She has shown great dignity and courage,” said local activist Blandine Deverlanges. “It was a huge gift for [French women] that she decided to speak out in front of the whole world, in front of her rapist.”

Her bravery in facing her husband and other accused men in court has earned widespread praise. During the trial, she sat with her daughter Caroline and at least two sons, just a few meters away from some of the men accused of these horrific crimes. The atmosphere in the courtroom was tense, with a mix of shock, anger and disbelief.

Community reactions: Divided and disbelieving
The mayor of Mazan, Louis Bonnet, has attempted to ease tensions, claiming that most of the alleged rapists came from neighboring villages and that Pellicot was not a longtime resident. He has condemned the attacks, but also suggested that threats against the accused and their families were expected. “If they have participated in these rapes, it is normal that they are considered targets,” he said. His comments have sparked further outrage, as they seem to downplay the seriousness of the crimes and the trauma suffered by Gisèle Pellicot.

Many people in Mazan and beyond feel that the case has highlighted a deeper issue of attitudes to sexual violence in France. “People here say ‘no one was killed.’ If [Pellicot] had killed his wife, it would have been much worse,” Bonnet remarked, suggesting that the psychological and emotional trauma inflicted on Gisèle is somehow less significant because she survived. This kind of rhetoric has only added fuel to the fire, leading to more anger and resentment among those who support Gizelle.

Women like Gizelle’s daughter Caroline have also been deeply affected by this. Caroline, who suspects she was also drugged by her father and had photographs taken of her without her knowledge, has been accused of sexual assault.

Rachel Gunn, known in the breakdancing world as “Regan”,

Rachel Gunn, known in the breakdancing world as “Regan”, remains the number one ranked female breakdancer globally, despite a turbulent performance for Team Australia at the Paris Olympics that sparked intense debate online. The controversy surrounding her zero-score performances in all three competition rounds has shed light on the ranking system used by the World DanceSport Federation (WDSF), prompting the organization to defend its methodology and address the uproar in the breakdancing community.

Regan’s Olympic Controversy

Regan’s performance in Paris has been the subject of discussion for weeks, drawing mixed reactions from fans and professionals alike. At 37, Gunn is no stranger to the competitive breakdancing scene. Still, her Olympic routine featuring unconventional moves like the “Sprinkler” and “Kangaroo Hop” divided judges and audiences. While some saw her performance as an innovative expression of the evolving art form of breakdancing, others felt it deviated too much from the established norms of competitive breaking.

The result? Zero scores in all three rounds, sparking intense debate over her qualifications and the current state of competitive breakdancing. In her first in-depth interview after the Games, Regan stood by her record as Australia’s top b-girl, explaining that “the record exists” and “anything can happen in a battle.” Her statement reflects the unpredictable nature of breakdancing battles, where scores can vary greatly depending on judges’ interpretation of creativity, style and technical skill.

WDSF under fire: Clarifying rankings

The World DanceSport Federation, which is responsible for organizing many official breaking events and maintaining global rankings, faced immediate criticism after the Olympics. Critics, including prominent figures in the breakdancing community, questioned the transparency of the WDSF and the validity of its ranking system. Some also accused the organization of failing to understand the essence of breaking, which has historically thrived as a grassroots, community-driven art form rather than a regulated sport.

Responding to these concerns, the WDSF released a statement to “provide clarity” on how the world rankings are calculated. According to the governing body, athletes are evaluated based on their top four performances over the past 12 months. However, to the surprise of many, the WDSF excluded Olympic events, including qualifiers, from the rankings. The move was intended to allow athletes to “focus solely on the Olympics” without worrying about accumulating ranking points.

However, this decision also meant that athletes were ranked based on events held before the end of 2023 or immediately after the Olympics. As a result, some athletes’ rankings were dependent on only one or two performances. This situation, described by the WDSF as “unique circumstances”, fueled confusion and discontent within the breakdancing community.

Breakdancing community reactions

The breakdancing world is not united on the issue. Regan’s unexpected performance and the ranking controversy that followed have divided public opinion, with some breakdancers and fans supporting her and others criticizing WDSF’s handling of the situation. Jack Slusser, vice president of Breaking for Gold USA, expressed his disappointment in an interview, arguing that WDSF “has no real merit” in the eyes of the breaking community.

Slusser claimed that the organization failed to host enough events that truly reflect breakdancing’s competitive landscape. He also said that many breakers only participated in WDSF events to gain points for Olympic qualification, not because they believed in the federation’s vision. “After Paris, there is no incentive or desire for breakers to participate in WDSF events,” he asserted, highlighting a growing disconnect between the community and the federation. A clash of cultures: At the heart of the breaking vs. organized sports controversy is a fundamental question about the nature of breakdancing and its place in organized sports. Born from the streets of New York City in the 1970s, breaking has always been a form of self-expression, where creativity and personal style are paramount. Many in the community argue that the structured format of competitions like the Olympics is not conducive to the organic, improvised spirit of breaking.

This sentiment has led to widespread debate over whether breakdancing should be included in future Olympic Games. While its debut in Paris brought the style unprecedented global exposure, some purists feel the art form loses something essential when placed under the rigid rules of competitive sports. Uncertainty about breaking’s future at the Olympics was further fueled when it was announced that the sport would not be part of the 2028 Games in Los Angeles.

In a poignant demonstration, a charity has hung baby vests.

In a poignant demonstration, a charity has hung baby vests on a bridge in Salford to draw attention to the fact that there are inadequate services for people affected by foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). The national organisation for FASD argues that many health authorities in England and Wales have failed to implement effective services to address this serious condition caused by alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

What is foetal alcohol spectrum disorder?

Foetal alcohol spectrum disorder is a range of conditions that can occur in individuals whose mothers drank alcohol during pregnancy. These conditions can lead to serious and lifelong problems, including problems with movement, vision, learning, emotional management and muscle and organ function. The disorder can be prevented, but once it occurs, it requires early intervention and ongoing support to manage.

The charity’s campaign
The national organisation for FASD has launched a high-profile campaign to promote better services and awareness. They placed baby vests on the side of a bridge at Media City in Salford as a clear visual reminder of the issue. The charity’s chief executive Sandra Butcher criticised NHS trusts for not following guidelines set out by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2022. These guidelines were created to improve the management and treatment of FASD.

Government and NHS responses
The UK and Welsh governments have publicly committed to addressing FASD through education and preventative measures. However, the charity’s report highlights a lack of action on the part of many health authorities. In particular, the NHS Cheshire and Merseyside, NHS Lancashire and South Cumbria and NHS Greater Manchester integrated care boards have not introduced specific services for FASD, according to the charity.

However, the Greater Manchester board was acknowledged for its efforts to implement the NICE guidelines. Despite this, the charity argues that more needs to be done.

Call to action
The charity has made a number of recommendations to improve the situation:

Clear guidance: They are urging NHS England and Wales to provide clear guidance on how to implement NICE guidelines relating to FASD.

Appointment of FASD lead: They want NHS boards and trusts to appoint a dedicated FASD lead to oversee the development and delivery of services.

Funding: The charity is calling on the UK government to allocate a small portion of alcohol duty revenue to create a new FASD prevention fund.

Sandra Butcher emphasised the urgency of these measures, saying many individuals suffering from FASD are currently undiagnosed and not receiving the support they need, which can lead to tragic consequences.

Government commitments
In response to the charity’s concerns, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Social Care said the government is dedicated to reducing the incidence of FASD. The NHS plans to prioritise preventive public health measures, including efforts to reduce alcohol-related harm. This includes promoting the “no alcohol, no risk” message during pregnancy to protect babies.

A Welsh Government spokesperson also confirmed their commitment to the cause, saying all health boards actively promote the message of abstaining from alcohol during pregnancy to ensure the safety of babies.

Challenges and future directions

Despite these commitments, challenges remain. The charity’s campaign highlights a systemic issue within the NHS in relation to the management of FASD. While some areas are making progress, inconsistency in service provision and a lack of dedicated resources remain major barriers.

The charity’s protest and recommendations aim to mobilise action and improve support for those affected by FASD. By drawing public and government attention to the issue, they hope to create a more consistent and effective approach to preventing and managing this disorder.

Conclusion
The issue of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder highlights a significant gap in health services which affects many families. The National Organisation for FASD’s protest is a powerful reminder of the need for continued and comprehensive support for those affected by this preventable condition. As the government and NHS work to address these concerns, ongoing advocacy and public awareness will be crucial in ensuring that all affected individuals receive the help they need.

In a significant ruling, Europe’s highest court has upheld a €2.4 billion.

In a significant ruling, Europe’s highest court has upheld a €2.4 billion fine against Google, marking a major breakthrough in a long-running antitrust case involving the tech giant. The decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) brings an end to a case that has been running for more than a decade and reflects ongoing scrutiny of Google’s practices in the global market.

Background of the case
The case began in 2009, when UK-based shopping comparison service Foundem filed a complaint against Google. The firm alleged that Google was manipulating search results to unfairly promote its shopping comparison service over its competitors. Foundem’s complaint, supported by other firms such as Kelkoo, argued that Google’s actions stifled competition and harmed consumers by limiting their choice.

The European Commission, the EU’s executive branch responsible for enforcing antitrust laws, investigated these claims and imposed a record €2.4 billion fine on Google in 2017. This fine was initially the largest ever imposed by the Commission. However, it was later surpassed by a €4.3 billion fine imposed on Google in 2018 for alleged anti-competitive practices relating to its Android operating system.

The verdict
The European Court of Justice has now upheld this €2.4 billion fine, rejecting Google’s appeal in its entirety. The Court confirmed that the European Commission’s findings – that Google’s practices were discriminatory and monopolistic – were correct. The verdict also states that Google, along with its parent company Alphabet, will bear its own legal costs, as well as those incurred by the European Commission.

In response to the verdict, Google expressed disappointment, highlighting that it had made changes to its practices in 2017 to comply with the European Commission’s earlier ruling. The company reported that these changes had generated billions of clicks for a number of comparison shopping services, indicating that its compliance efforts over the past seven years have been successful.

Implications of the decision

Anne Witt, professor of law at EDHEC Business School, described the decision as a “significant decision” that exhausts Google’s legal options in this particular case. She also said that the company may face further legal challenges. “Several follow-up actions by injured parties claiming compensation for damages suffered as a result of Google’s anti-competitive conduct are already pending in national courts,” Witt said.

The fine is part of a broader pattern of regulatory actions against Google, which has faced multiple fines from the European Commission for various antitrust violations. To date, Google has accumulated €8.2 billion in fines from the EU, covering issues ranging from shopping comparison services to the promotion of its own apps on Android.

The wider context of the EU’s antitrust actions
The decision is part of a larger crackdown on big tech companies by European regulators. The EU has been particularly active in investigating the practices of major tech firms, aimed at addressing concerns about market dominance and anti-competitive behavior. The ruling against Google also comes amid ongoing investigations into the company’s advertising technology and its broader market practices.

The EU’s approach to regulating big tech reflects a growing trend toward stricter oversight and enforcement of antitrust laws. The Digital Markets Act, a key piece of legislation currently under review, could further impact companies like Google. If found guilty of violating the act, Google could face fines of up to 10% of its annual global turnover.

Other regulatory developments
The investigation into big tech extends beyond Google. On the same day as the Google ruling, the ECJ also ordered Apple to repay 13 billion euros in unpaid taxes to Ireland. This decision highlights the EU’s broad regulatory stance against major technology and financial firms, aimed at ensuring fair competition and compliance with tax laws.

Looking Ahead
The EU’s regulatory actions are likely to have far-reaching effects on the operations of large tech companies in Europe and could potentially influence global practices. As the tech landscape continues to evolve, companies like Google will have to deal with a complex regulatory environment.

For Google, this decision is the end of one legal battle but the beginning of potential new challenges. The company will need to adapt to the evolving landscape of tech regulation as well as address ongoing legal and regulatory issues. The outcome of these cases will likely shape the future of both the technology industry and the broader market landscape.

As the global tech industry watches closely, the EU’s approach to antitrust enforcement serves as an important precedent for how to regulate market dominance and anticompetitive practices. The impact of this decision will be felt not just by Google but also by other tech giants facing similar investigations and challenges.

As unseasonal heat continues to rage in China,

As unseasonal heat continues to rage in China, a heated debate has erupted on social media over the use of air conditioners in classrooms. In some of China’s hottest cities, where temperatures have soared above 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit), parents are demanding that schools install air conditioning to provide a more comfortable learning environment for students. However, not everyone agrees, and the conversation has become a topic of a larger discussion about education, health and government responsibility.

Rising Temperatures and Increasing Demands
China has been experiencing intense heat waves in recent years, with temperatures consistently breaking records. Earlier this year, China’s Meteorological Bureau warned that these heat waves could become even more frequent and severe, and that maximum temperatures could potentially rise by up to 2.8 degrees Celsius (5 degrees Fahrenheit) over the next 30 years. Given this alarming trend, many parents believe that classrooms should have air conditioning to ensure children’s safety and comfort during extreme heat.

Lin Yujun, the father of a junior high school student in Guangdong, one of China’s hottest provinces, is one of many parents who think air conditioning is a must. “Without air conditioning, it would be challenging to concentrate on studies,” he told a local news outlet, reflecting the concerns of many who believe unbearable classroom temperatures are hampering students’ ability to focus and learn effectively.

Debate heats up in Changsha
The debate heated up in Changsha, a major city in southern China, when the local education department said it would not install air conditioners in schools. The department justified its decision by saying it wanted to “instill a sense of hard work and endurance” in students. The comment, considered outdated and irrelevant by many, sparked widespread outrage on social media platforms such as Weibo, where users argued that exposing children to extreme heat is neither productive nor healthy.

One Weibo user hit back at the education department’s comment: “Hard work and endurance? Can we ask the education bureau to work in 40-degree heat, then discuss whether this is the way to instill such a spirit in children?” Another user said, “Global warming has become so serious. What do you want children to do?”

This response reflects widespread discontent among the public, especially parents, who feel that their children’s well-being should be prioritized over abstract ideals such as “endurance.” They argue that with climate change becoming more extreme, measures such as installing air conditioners are becoming a necessity rather than a luxury.

Concerns over cost and health risks
While many parents support the idea of air conditioning in schools, not everyone agrees. Some are concerned about the cost implications. Schools argue that installing air conditioners would be an expensive endeavor, not only because of the initial cost of the units but also because of ongoing electricity bills. Some schools have proposed that parents contribute to the cost, which has caused further controversy.

For example, an elementary school in Xiangtan, another city in southern China, invited parents to donate money for air conditioners. The request sparked a fierce public response, leading the local education bureau to order the school to return the money to parents. Despite the controversy, some online commentators defended the school’s approach, arguing that students’ comfort and safety should be prioritized, even if it requires additional contributions from parents.

There are also concerns about potential health risks associated with air-conditioned classrooms. Some parents worry that children may be more prone to catching colds or other infections when constantly exposed to cold air. “Not all parents are in favor of installing air conditioners,” said one parent from Chongqing. “Maybe the education board can extend school holidays according to the weather.” Alternative Solutions: Delayed

Starts and Ice Buckets
Given the challenges associated with installing air conditioners, some schools have turned to creative alternatives to escape the heat. In some schools, large pieces of ice are placed in buckets around classrooms to help cool the environment. This low-tech solution, while temporary and less effective than air conditioning, shows the lengths schools are going to to make learning environments more tolerable.

Additionally, many schools in eastern Jiangxi province and southwestern Sichuan province decided to delay the start of the autumn semester. The new school session, which was originally scheduled to begin on September 2, was postponed by a week to avoid the peak of the heat wave. This decision has been generally well received, as it allows students to stay safe at home rather than endure the stifling heat in classrooms.

Around 600,000 people gathered in a huge field outside the Timor-Leste capital.

Around 600,000 people gathered in a huge field outside the Timor-Leste capital Dili for the mass led by Pope Francis. The event, one of the largest events of his papacy, was attended by almost half of the country’s population. As the only Catholic-majority nation in Southeast Asia, Timor-Leste welcomed the Pope with great enthusiasm during his Asia-Pacific tour, highlighting the deep faith and spirit of the Timorese people.

Pope Francis’ visit to Timor-Leste is seen as a historic moment for this small but deeply religious country. The open-air mass was held at Tasitolu, a controversial site, but the huge crowd reflected the country’s strong Catholic faith and hope for a brighter future.

A nation united in faith
Timor-Leste, also known as East Timor, is one of the most Catholic countries in the world. For many Timorese, the Pope’s visit is a once in a lifetime experience, bringing them closer to the heart of their faith. The atmosphere at the Mass was full of emotion and devotion, as families, some of whom had travelled long distances, gathered to pray and hear the Pope’s words. The significance of the Mass was not only religious, but also symbolic. It was a moment of unity for a nation that has experienced decades of conflict and hardship. After gaining independence from Indonesia in 2002, Timor-Leste has been on a long journey towards peace and stability. The Pope’s visit, with its message of hope and reconciliation, resonated deeply with the people. Controversies surrounding the venue Although the gathering was a powerful display of faith, it was also surrounded by controversy. The Mass took place on a disputed piece of land in Tasitolu, a site that had recently been cleared of homes by the government. About 90 people were evicted from the area just weeks before the Pope’s visit, with their homes demolished. Local officials claim these residents were illegally occupying government land, but for those evicted, the demolition was a painful loss of both shelter and community. Zerita Correa, one of the evicted residents, expressed her anguish at the loss of her home and belongings. “They even destroyed our belongings inside the house,” she said. Her family, like many others, moved to Dili from rural areas in search of work and a better life. Now, they face the uncertainty of finding new housing while remaining close to their children’s schools and workplaces.

The evictions have drawn criticism and have fueled tensions in what should have been a purely festive event. However, the government says residents were warned in advance of plans to clear the area.

A troubled past: The case of Bishop Belo
Another layer of complexity to the pope’s visit is the ongoing scandal involving a prominent East Timorese clergyman, Bishop Carlos Ximenes Belo. The Nobel Peace Prize-winning bishop, once celebrated as an independence hero, has been accused of sexually abusing minors during the 1980s and 1990s. The revelations have cast a shadow over the Catholic Church in Timor-Leste and fueled calls for accountability and justice for victims.

The Vatican was reportedly aware of the allegations against Bishop Belo since 2019 and took disciplinary measures in 2020, including a restriction on his activities and a ban on voluntary contact with minors. However, many victims and their families are still waiting for more concrete action and redress.

During his visit, Pope Francis did not specifically address Bishop Belo’s case but spoke broadly about the need to protect young people from abuse. He said, “We must not forget the many children and adolescents whose dignity has been violated.” His words have received mixed reactions. Some applauded the Pope’s call for protection, while others felt it failed to directly address the issue.

Call for action from abuse survivors
The Survivors’ Network of People Abused by Clergy in Oceania has criticised the Church’s handling of the Bello case, arguing there has been insufficient action and compensation for victims. They have called on Pope Francis to allocate Church funds to compensate those affected by abuse within the Church. So far, the Pope has not met any victims during his visit.

This absence of direct contact with victims of abuse has been seen by some as a missed opportunity by the Church to show its commitment to justice and healing. As the Church faces scrutiny over its handling of abuse cases worldwide, many in Timor-Leste and beyond expect more decisive action to be taken in the future.

A message of hope and reconciliation
Despite the controversies, Pope Francis used his time in Timor-Leste to spread a message of hope and reconciliation. He praised the country’s resilience and perseverance through decades of conflict and hardship. “We are blessed by God and by the grace of God to be with all our people,” he said.

In December 2017, the city of Montecito, California, faced one of its greatest

In December 2017, the city of Montecito, California, faced one of its greatest challenges: the Thomas Fire. At the time, it was the largest wildfire in California history, and it was heading straight for this small, picturesque town with less than 10,000 residents. While the flames of this massive fire threatened to engulf Montecito, the community made extensive preparations over the years, allowing it to escape nearly unscathed.

The Community Prepares for the Worst

Montecito, located in Southern California, is a town known for its natural beauty and affluent residents. But in 2017, the beauty of its landscape made it highly vulnerable to wildfire. For years, the Montecito Fire Department had been proactively preparing the community for this exact scenario. The city’s strategy wasn’t about reacting at the last moment; instead, it was based on decades of foresight and careful planning.

The Montecito Fire Department began a comprehensive wildfire mitigation program in 1994. With wildfires becoming more frequent and intense due to climate change, Montecito leaders knew they needed a proactive approach. Over the years, they worked closely with residents to reduce fire risk and create a culture of preparedness.

Maeve Juarez, a wildland fire specialist with the Montecito Fire Department, explained how important this preparedness was. “Our strength lies in making sure our entire community is prepared for wildfires,” she said. Residents regularly participated in fire drills, cleaned up dry leaves and dead plants, and fortified their homes with fire-resistant materials. The fire department provided free wood-chipping services and held community clean-up days to remove potential fire fuels such as dry shrubs and overgrown vegetation.

Facing the Flames: The Thomas Fire
The Thomas Fire began in early December 2017 and quickly grew to a massive size, burning vast areas of Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. On December 16, the fire reached Montecito, further fueled by strong sundowner winds that blew through the area at speeds of up to 65 mph (105 km/h). The fire department, supported by more than 8,000 firefighters, had strategically positioned itself to protect the town. Despite the high winds and the intensity of the fire, Montecito’s preparations paid off. The flames reached above the town in the early morning and for the next 12 hours, firefighters battled spot fires and falling embers. The coordinated efforts of the community and firefighters were crucial. When night fell and the winds died down, the worst had passed for Montecito. While the Thomas Fire burned more than 282,000 acres (114,000 hectares) in California, Montecito managed to escape with relatively little damage. Only seven homes were destroyed in the fire, a remarkable result given the scale and ferocity of the fire. “Hundreds of structures benefited from alert fire suppression resources that were deployed in advance,” Juarez explained.

Building a unified approach
Montecito’s success in dealing with the Thomas Fire wasn’t just about fighting fires — it was about years of building trust, fostering a sense of community and implementing a unified approach to wildfire preparation. The community knew what to do and acted quickly. This level of coordination and cooperation is something many communities can learn from.

One key to Montecito’s success was the trust between the fire department and residents. When evacuation orders came, nearly everyone complied. This made it easier for firefighters to do their jobs without worrying about putting residents in danger. Town residents also took simple but effective steps like leaving their driveway gates open so fire trucks could easily access their properties.

The community was also lucky to have time on its side. They got a few days’ notice of the fire’s growth, allowing them to fully prepare. The fire department deployed more than 130 engines and 30 firefighters to build fire barriers, remove vegetation and place water tanks in strategic locations. This kind of preparation is key to preventing wildfires from getting out of control.

Lessons for other communities
The Montecito experience shows that preparation is key to surviving wildfires. But what can other communities learn from it? Climate change, longer dry seasons and urban sprawl are increasing the risk of wildfires in many parts of the world. Here are some steps other cities and towns can take:

Create a community plan: A good wildfire mitigation strategy involves everyone — residents, local governments and emergency services. Communities need to assess their most critical assets, such as schools, hospitals and water supply systems, and make plans to protect them.

Reduce fire fuel: This means removing dry brush, dead plants and other materials that can easily catch fire. Offer community clean-up days and free wood-chip fires

Fans in Hollywood and around the world are mourning the death.

Fans in Hollywood and around the world are mourning the death of James Earl Jones, the legendary actor whose deep and resonant voice brought some of cinema’s most unforgettable characters to life. Jones, who has died aged 93, is best remembered for his iconic portrayal of the voice of Darth Vader in the Star Wars franchise, but his career spanned more than six decades and included many great roles on stage, screen and television.

An iconic voice remembered

James Earl Jones’ contribution to the world of cinema was huge. Best known for voicing the menacing Darth Vader in the Star Wars saga, his deep baritone voice became synonymous with one of the greatest villains in film history. Star Wars creator George Lucas paid tribute, describing Jones as an “incredible actor” with “one of the most unique voices in both art and emotion”. In his heartfelt statement, Lucas praised Jones’ ability to bring “depth, sincerity and meaning” to every role he played, but also stressed that he was “a beautiful human being” beyond his work.

“For nearly half a century, he was Darth Vader, but the secret is that he was a beautiful human being,” Lucas said. “He brought depth, sincerity and meaning to all of his roles, most importantly as a devoted husband to the late Cecily and a father to Flynn. James will be missed by many of us… friends and fans alike.”

A legacy beyond Darth Vader

While many remember him as the voice behind the fearsome mask of Darth Vader, James Earl Jones’ career included a wide variety of roles that showcased his versatility and talent. He appeared in a wide variety of films, from dramas to comedies, from Field of Dreams to Coming to America and Conan the Barbarian. Each of these roles showcased his ability to captivate audiences with his powerful presence and impressive voice.

Mark Hamill, who played Darth Vader’s son Luke Skywalker in Star Wars, expressed his grief by posting “RIP Dad” on social media along with a broken heart emoji. This simple but touching message reflected Hamill’s deep respect and affection for his co-star.

Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy also paid tribute, calling James Earl Jones “one of the most versatile and talented actors of our time.” She added, “The menacing baritone he brought to Darth Vader will always be beloved by fans and considered one of the finest villains in cinema. His imposing presence on screen and warm personality off-screen will be greatly missed.”

A career spanning over six decades

James Earl Jones’ career began on the stage, where he soon became known for his impressive voice and powerful acting. He earned critical acclaim for his work in the theater, winning Tony Awards for his roles in The Great White Hope and Fences. His ability to bring intensity and authenticity to each role made him a popular actor on both Broadway and Hollywood.

Jones’ transition from stage to screen was seamless. His film career began in the 1960s, but it was in the 1970s and 1980s that he became a household name. In addition to Star Wars, he appeared in films such as Field of Dreams, where he played reclusive author Terrence Mann, and Coming to America, where he played King Jaffe Joffer. To each role, he brought dignity, strength, and sometimes a sense of humor that set him apart from his peers.

Jones wasn’t just a film and stage actor; he was also a beloved figure on television. His appearances ranged from voice roles to guest roles on popular TV shows. His work earned him several Emmy Awards, establishing his reputation as one of the most talented and versatile actors of his generation.

A voice that defined generations

Beyond the screen and stage, James Earl Jones’ voice is one of the most recognizable voices in the world. Not only did he give life to Darth Vader, but he also provided the voice of Mufasa in Disney’s The Lion King. His rich and authoritative voice was perfect for the wise and noble Lion King, and his performance left a lasting impression on audiences around the world.

The strength of his voice made him a natural choice for narration and voice-over work. His voice could convey seriousness, authority, and warmth, all in equal measure. It’s no surprise that he was chosen to appear in numerous documentaries, commercials, and even the voice of CNN, with his famous “This is CNN” line becoming part of pop culture.

Remembering the man behind the voice

While many tributes focus on his iconic roles and voice, those who knew James Earl Jones personally remember him as a kind and humble person. Despite his monumental achievements, he was known for his humility and warmth. Colleagues and friends described him as a gentle giant who never let fame change his personality.